A recent essay in the New York Times raises the question as to whether individual tax payments should be considered public information. It has been suggested that public disclosure of tax payments would create pressure to correct inequalities and loopholes in the current tax system. Surprisingly, strict secrecy regarding tax records is a relatively modern aspect of the system.
Presidential candidates do release abbreviated tax records for public inspection. Should individuals be expected to do the same?
Link, via The Cap Times (whence the image).
In the first half of the 20th century, Congress twice required tax disclosure. In 1923 and 1924, individual and corporate taxpayers had to make public their tax payments but not entire returns. Proponents of disclosure said the measure would encourage tax compliance and reduce improper business conduct...
In the wake of accounting scandals and corporate earnings frauds of recent years, not to mention aggressive tax avoidance schemes, some experts say we should bring back corporate tax disclosure...
“If people could see how terrible the system is,” Professor Kotlikoff said, “perhaps then the appeal of a simple, straightforward and fair tax system might rise.”
Presidential candidates do release abbreviated tax records for public inspection. Should individuals be expected to do the same?
Link, via The Cap Times (whence the image).
Who the hell comes up with this?
Some things I'd like to see released though. How much are different deductions and credits actually costing in terms of revenue? How much do the people claiming various deductions make?
Oh and here's a big one- a list of incomes (no identifiers) and total tax paid- federal income, capital gains, state income. Yes, state income taxes can appear on federal returns because they're deductible. That would settle a lot of arguments about taxes paid by people at various income levels.
Pretty much useless, ans that's a good thing.