Cartoonist Caldwell Tanner of College Humor suggests that web browsers can be compared to modes of transportion. Are his descriptions accurate?
http://www.collegehumor.com/article:1802516 via Geekologie | Previously on Neatorama: The Expulsion from Eden Written With Internet Catchphrases
On an unrelated note, the comment panel says I'm logged in as "Edward" though my profile page shows the correct log-in. It's too early for April Fool's so...
Chill out!
Thank you for the laugh Caldwell!
@Gauldar - don't take it seriously either, or they win.
Over all I have to agree that Firefox is the top choice if you only use the add ons that make it safer. I also use Chrome at times. Won't touch IE with a ten foot mouse.
I have 5 add-ons running, Adblock, Downloadhelper, Xmarks and a couple of others all of which vastly add to FF's usability.
tl;dr The cartoonist has no real idea what he's talking about
IE should be a very old mule, it'll get the job done most of the time just don't expect it to be flashy or quick.
Safari should be a lesser looking bike covered in bling.
They may not be religions, but they sure seem like political parties.
The new Opera is delicious, I'm falling for it.
Firefox: takes minutes to start so I don't use it unless I need one of the firefox only fabulous add-ons.
IE 6: Good Old timer, opened the door to what we see today in internet, you must respect your elder.
IE 7: still faster at startime than firefox, IE 8 just lazy work, like vista.
IE 9: I have my hopes up with this one.
Safari: it's OK just like chrome, but chrome is doing a lot better with -webkit, and getting over it.
Cartoon was fun.
Humor fell flat. Please try again.
It's not meant to be a comprehensive comparison, just a caricature of their common features and perceptions.
Have to say though, chrome's speed might be over exaggerated, even for a caricature. Especially since safari is a bicycle. They're almost an exact speed match, since they both use webkit.
:D