It always annoyed me that jumping into lightspeed/hyperspace/warpspeed made some sort of noise. In space, no one can hear you scream.
You’ve probably heard this fact stated before by your high school science teacher or some killjoy walking out of a movie theater: If movies were trying to be scientifically accurate, there would be absolutely no sound out in space. That means no booster rockets rumbling, no laser blasts during an epic space battle; just pure silence. Space, by it’s very definition, is made up of absolutely nothing. Since sound is caused by vibrations through a medium — air, water, etc. — there’s simply no way for sound to transmit over any distance. Of course, watching almost any action scene from Star Wars with the mute button on would be incredibly boring, so filmmakers usually get a pass for this one.
From the Upcoming ueue, submitted by ari.
1. space isnt empty. it has allot of atoms in it running around. Its just not DENSE enough to carry sound.
2. the sounds you hear could be the Sounds inside the ship, from Generators and soforth IN THE SHIP that are DOING their thing.. AS metals are a conduit for sound.
AND as most engines need Oxygen to combust, it would probably SOUND into the cab of the craft.
1) There is no music in space: the members of the orchestra playing the Star Wars theme would be instantly killed in the vacuum
2) There is no such thing as "Force"
And so on.
Articles like this are annoying and miss the point, the point being that every "mistake" they are talking about is there to do a better job of telling the story. No sound, no fiery explosions, no hyperspace, taking forever to get anywhere, taking years to talking to aliens would be BORING BORING BORING. It would be all exposition and NO conflict. It would be Star Trek the Motion Picture but a million times worse!
Why don't people like this ever write about how the Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter or the Passion of the Christ aren't scientifically accurate?
This is, generally speaking, not what the story describes. Hyperspace travel involves travel through extra dimensions, which may be far emptier than normal space. Wormhole travel effectively shortens the distance the travelers must traverse, making high speeds unnecessary. Warp drive distorts spacetime in a bubble around the ship, contracting in in front and expanding it behind; the ship is technically stationary, and so I suspect debris would appear to curve around the bubble, rather than penetrate it and collide with the ship.
Occupants can now hear sounds and insantly know what direction they are coming from.
I was going to post along the same lines, you fiend you.
No to mention the look of the aliens (two arms, two legs, ears, nose, etc.)
Kubrick
One thing I'd like to ad: while you are not slower in Zero Gravity, it is not advisable to move as fast as you could, as you will be sent tumbling into the next wall. There is a reason, why real astronauts are just "floating slowly around the cockpit" - the author just didn't get it.
Now let's have a post about fireman movies that are badly done. How about they couldn't walk in a burning building without their BAs on, let alone talk to eachother. Lame.
Moving in slow-mo in space? I'd move in slow-mo, if it helped me avoid hitting my head, hitting vital sensitive equipment, and otherwise flailing about. Haste makes waste.
My questions:
With laser guns, why do stormtroopers keep missing? Why miss at all?
Why do robots bleep and bloop? If you must communicate with a robot, wouldn't you make it (as robots are all 'made') able to communicate in your language --- right out da box?
Why does Schwarzenegger's Terminator have an Austrian accent, if it was manufactured in the U.S.? (Wasn't it?) Austrian voice chip?
In Tom Cruise's War of the Worlds, why do the aliens vaporize people that they will later collect for food? Playing with their food? Naughty.
my complaints with the list:
#8. nobody knows
#7. nobody knows/advent of technology?
#3. don't spacesuits inhibit some quick motion?
#1. there are lots of planets with similar gravity to earth, for example, mars. the planets humans go to in scfi shows like star trek, probably don't have crushing gravity, because we don't want to go to planets with crushing gravity.
also star trek explains the proliferation of humanoid aliens.
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/970603.html
Basically your skin seems to keep your blood and urine from boiling. After about 15 seconds you pass out from lack of oxygen. A couple minutes later, you are most likely dead.
It sounds like the author's point isn't to point out how terrible science fiction is for not portraying everything right, but is trying to just make people aware of certain facts. I do believe that some of these things could be incorporated into movies without making them "boring". Number 3 and number 2 are good exmaples.
There! FTFY
I liked the one about wormholes. The author says they wouldn't work like that, and they're only theoretical anyways. Well, if they're only theoretical, couldn't they work whatever way we wanted them to?