Holding Back the Sahara with a Bacterial Wall

The Sahara Desert is growing, consequently reducing food production in the area and therefore inducing poverty. But architect Magnus Larsson has an ambitious and fanciful plan to use bacteria to create a calcite wall on the desert's southern edge:
Bacillus pasteurii is commonly found in wetlands, and is able to chemically create calcite. By unleashing the bacteria on areas of the desert, sand could be solidified into sandstone within a few hours. The way Larsson proposes to do this is fill massive balloons with bacteria and station them along the Sahara's southern border, where the weight of the oncoming waves of sand would pop the balloons. The released bacteria would then quickly set up a protective wall to block future sand shifts.

http://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2009-07/preventing-expansion-sahara-bacteria-built-walls

This is the stupidest thing we could possibly do! Just look what happened with African bees, Eurasian Watermilfoil, Caulerpa taxifolia, etc. Every time we introduce a foreign species into an ecosystem it blows up in our faces.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Funny- Only a few hours ago I read some article about that the Sahara is Shrinking- not growing. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8150415.stm

I dunno- I'm no scientist.

But somehow I seem to understand that the growing and shrinking of the desert has something to do with flexibility and that making firm walls stops that flexibility- At such a point it perhaps coudn't grow anymore because you'ld solidify the sand. But you would also take way any opportunity to use that same patch of soil to grow stuff if the green zone would shift again. So by solidifying- building hard walls, you would only lose land instead of protecting area's.
That makes no sence.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
It has the potential to develop into one of those bad sci-fi movies, where they intend to do good, but it grows and grows and grows and mutates until the ENTIRE CONTINENT is stone.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The Sahara was wet and filled with lakes during much of humanity's prehistory as depicted in cave paintings in the area. It is thought that the drying out of this area was what caused people to move to the Nile valley, bringing diverse tools and skills to jump start civilization there leading to the Pharaohs in the north and the Nubian civilization in the south.

The theory of the Saharan heat pump proposes that the point of maximum sunlight, which ironically creates so much heat that it causes air to rise quickly and pulls in moisture over the mountains from the oceans, used to be over the Sahara, making it a land of Savana grasses, forests and lakes. As the tilt of the earth changed the hot zone moved south (no comments), turning the Congo from forest or whatever it was (not desert) into a wet jungle and leaving the Sahara dry.

Many proponents of this theory suspect that this will reverse itself but take a long time by human standards. I see nothing wrong with hastening this but there are some already proven desert reclamation techniques that I think are superior to building a bacteria/sand wall. Nations on the southern edge of the Sahara are already at it and it is a self-reinforcing process just as desert expansion is. More moisture causes more vegetation which captures more moisture as dew, promotes rain and moderates the temperature. Less moisture leaves less vegetation and less moderation. Push the system far enough in a new direction and it will switch equilibrium states.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 11 comments
Email This Post to a Friend
"Holding Back the Sahara with a Bacterial Wall"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More