For homeowners caught in the nation's housing collapse, having their homes foreclosed is like a nightmare that they can't fight ... or can they?
Chris Hoyer, a Tampa, Florida, lawyer told homeowners that there are three simple words that they can say to stop the foreclosure process, or at least delay it for a while: produce the note.
Kathy Lovelace lost her job and was about to lose her house, too. But then she made a seemingly simple request of the bank: Show me the original mortgage paperwork.
And just like that, the foreclosure proceedings came to a standstill.
Lovelace and other homeowners around the country are managing to stave off foreclosure by employing a strategy that goes to the heart of the whole nationwide mess.
During the real estate frenzy of the past decade, mortgages were sold and resold, bundled into securities and peddled to investors. In many cases, the original note signed by the homeowner was lost, stored away in a distant warehouse or destroyed.
Persuading a judge to compel production of hard-to-find or nonexistent documents can, at the very least, delay foreclosure, buying the homeowner some time and turning up the pressure on the lender to renegotiate the mortgage.
(Photo: Chris O'Meara/AP)
If you are thinking it will give you time to get back on your feet and back on track, chances are not good... Banks are not set up to help people out who get behind. It's the exact opposite, when you get behind, they start tagging you with a bunch of fees and try to get every last cent out of you before they have to foreclose...
Banks are dumb. The first thing a bank does with a foreclosed home is to shut off the power. Hello, if you have a basement and a sump pump(s).. What happens to those when the power gets shut off... YEP!!! Flooded basement!!
What happens when you get behind in your payments? They fee the hell out of you, so even if you wanted to catch up, odds(and fees) are stacked massively against you...
You can't just say "produce the note" as if those are magic words. What they are doing is filing a request for production of discovery documents in their foreclosure case. The bank then has a while to either locate the document and provide it to you, or come up with a reason why they don't have to give it to you.
Were I the bank's attorney, the first thing I would do is send the homeowner a set of interrogatories and the only questions would be "did you take a mortgage out for Property X at our bank" and "do you agree those mortgage payments for Property X have not been paid?" Bam. Problem solved. Either the homeowner admits they owe it (thereby making the necessity of producing the original note pointless) or they lie under oath (an equally bad option).
Considering the BILLIONS of dollars that the banks are getting from the federal government we should all be getting more of a break than what has been proposed.
Mind you, it wouldn't really help me in either situation, I destroyed my inheritance to buy a house that isn't worth what I paid for it anymore. But at least I don't have a mortgage. :P
Just another excuse not to take responsibility for poor choices. Anyone else tired of hearing about all these people who shouldn't lose their homes? As a homeowner whose never missed a payment I'm sick of everyone saying that these people deserve the help.
And that's not fair for a whole lot more people than the few people who got houses that shouldn't have.
What would worry me is not whether I could repay the mortage, but whether I was repaying the correct bank.
A few thoughts. Most homeowners would also have a copy of the note, and the plaintiff could seek it from them in discovery.
Asking what the amount of the mortgage was and what the payments were in court might not help the plaintiff, since the terms often called for payments to balloon at a certain point and in a certain fashion, as well as charges for mortgage insurance that change over time (a friend lost a house to that on a "fixed rate" mortgage), etc. Its not so simple as how much are the payments and for how long.
Zombie- your comments are ironic, as I see them as being basically brain-dead. Did your former employer not contribute to this mess in any way? Did they intentionally not verify income? Did they even encourage the borrower to LIE on forms? Many, if not most, did. Furthermore, the way the fiat monetary system of the USA is setup, either;
1) the monetary supply must continuously grow at a rate fast enough to pay the interest on previously created money,
or,
2) the whole house of cards collapses, starting with those least able to pay.
This money MUST have been lent to continue inflating the bubble. When the bubble stops inflating it pops and can not be blown up again. This has happened and our POTUS et. al. are blowing their hot air (and massive debt - aka money) into empty space.
And the answer you get is "I don't know. Why the hell do you think I'm asking for the paperwork?"
The banks will have to produce the "original note", not a copy obtained from the Clerk of Court as some people have stated on here.
If the lender is allowed to proceed without that "original note", there is a possibility another institution, which may have bought your note along the way, will also try to collect the same debt from you again.
A Tennessee borrower recently had precisely that happen to her. Her lender, Ameriquest, foreclosed on her in July of 2007. About three months later, another bank sent her a default notice for the mortgage on the house she just lost. She called to find out what was going on. After being transferred from place to place and left on hold for lengthy periods of time, no one could explain what happened. They said they would get back to her, but never did. Now, she faces the risk of having her credit continually damaged for a debt she no longer owes.
http://www.tinyurl.com/producenotevideo
propertites in this system who knows where this will lead. It will be interesting to see what the bond investors will have to say about all this. The courts should side with the homeowners thus ending foreclosures for the most part. One bad thing is guess who has a lot of money invested in places like GMAC and others? If you guessed the taxpayer your right. But we were promised know more taxpayer bailouts for banks. But you can bet this will cost taxpayers millions