The Reports of Life on Mars are Greatly Exaggerated

A few days ago, Craig Covault wrote an article for Aviation Week claiming that the Mars Phoenix lander didn't just find ice - it had discovered "potential for life" on Mars and that the White House was briefed about it:

"They have discovered water on Mars for the third or fourth time," one senior Mars scientists joked about the hubbub around the water ice announcement.

The other data not discussed openly yet are far more "provocative," Phoenix officials say.

In fact, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory science team for the MECA wet-chemistry instrument that made the findings was kept out of a July 31 news conference at the University of Arizona Phoenix control center. The goal was to prevent them from being asked any questions that could reveal information before NASA is ready to make an announcement, sources say.

The Bush Administration's Presidential Science Advisor's office, however, has been briefed on the new information that NASA hopes to release as early as mid August. It is possible an announcement would not come until September, to allow for additional analysis. That will depend upon the latest results still being analyzed from the spacecraft's organic oven and soil chemistry laboratories. (Source - Thanks Geekazoid!)

The news was picked up by Slashdot and the blogosphere was propelled into a tizzy, despite NASA and the White House's quick denial of the rumor.

So, let's play a fun guessing game. What do you think the "provocative" news is all about?


All it takes is one fossil and one drop of water and suddenly small towns in the midwest and south start tearing themselves apart.

Figuratively.

I think it'll be some chemical component that while "provocative" to the scientific community will seem kind of pale to regular work-a-day Joes.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
My first internet experience was watching "live" video of the first Mars rover years ago. It also was the first time I heard Sublime, not that it matters or is related in any other way than I really remember that day vividly. I have no idea what they've found, but I'm very anxious to find out! I wish more people were as excited as I am.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'll have to agree with xadrian, probably something the scientists and geeks will get excited about, but the rest of us nothing really spectacular. Probably some chemical component and the like.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Bush sr. was desperate to have a manned exploration team go to Mars when he was prez, but it was too expensive. It seems Mars exploration is yet another way he is living his dreams through George W.
George Bush Sr. knows that there are non-natural artifacts on Mars (and the moon btw), but for some reason is determined not to let the public know.
OK, go ahead, let the ridicule begin! People can't stand the idea that someone may have been there millenia ago. Even atheists and hipsters who claim to scoff at religious fundamentalism are all too quick to deny the possibility.
Water on Mars = life (at some point at least) on Mars.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
It has allways pussled me why the official objectives of the explorations allways are made so limited, finding water, measuring temperature, measuring chemical compositions, etc.

It seems to me that something is deliberately hided by officially setting so limited objectives.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 21 comments
Email This Post to a Friend
"The Reports of Life on Mars are Greatly Exaggerated"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More