It's long been known that an attractive face is highly symmetric - but now, Anthony Little of the University of Stirling, Scotland, and colleagues have gone one step further: they are attractive because they advertise genetic quality or fertility.
Using mug shots of Europeans, the Hadza of Tanzania, one of the last hunter gatherer cultures, and macaque monkeys, measurements were made and people were asked to judge the masculinity of the most and least symmetric pictures.
Whether a member of a troop or a tribe, symmetric males had more masculine facial proportions and symmetric females had more feminine facial proportions.
"In humans, if you look at female models, for example, they tend to be pretty symmetric and at the extremes of femininity," Dr Little says.
He adds "One good face trait deserves another - symmetric men and women appear to have other good face traits".
The findings back the claim that the masculinity/femininity of faces is linked with symmetry and hence advertise quality, that is good genes.
Biological quality can mean many things but as symmetry and femininity/masculinity arise during development then one explanation for the findings is that "both traits could advertise quality in terms of resistance to disease, or environmental stresses and that might mean people with these traits are healthier and live longer," says Dr Little.
What it came down to was those people had character, were distinguished, unique.
I think it's just being one extreme or another. Either being perfectly symmetrical, or really uniquely asymmetrical. I mean look at Clint Eastwood's sneer! Very asymmetrical, but girls love the guy.
And the genes thing is already on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facial_symmetry
"Animal studies show that diseased mothers give birth to offspring that show greater asymmetries."
:-P
Heres another take on solving this eternal mystery.
Also analyze the women on my site.
That's kind of a big leap to say that nobody disputes that. How I love pseudo-science.
I was just about to mention that! :)
thanks a lot " Anthony Little of the University of Stirling, Scotland, and colleagues", if that's your real name.
L - a large part of what we consider "beauty" is youth. Even is a face is not all that attractive, if it's young, the person will be more fertile.
Other symbols of fertility/health in areas other than the face (in women) include a low waist/hip ratio, healthy weight, full breasts, and shiny hair.
Carl - Attractiveness in males is not as important, as status and fidelity is considered just as (or even more) desirable than genes by women. Maybe that's why asymmetrical male faces could be considered more attractive than asymmetrical female faces.
This is the evolutionary psychology perspective. Keep in mind that it focuses on the species as a whole rather than specific individuals.
"The Golden Ratio"
"Phi"
and
1: 1.618
Use your favorite search engine to do some research on the golden ratio and the beauty ratio.
if symetrical face is more atrractive then why 90% of the blinde dates i hade wanted me and why i have been told that i have amazing eyes nose lips face and so and that i am verry pretty\handsome\beautifull and that i should be a model?
im waiting for your answer.
bye.