The two keys are a big blanket and ruthlessness - - the video portrays pretty accurately how pleased the typical newborn is to be swaddled. Here's some more tips on swaddling a baby.
The two keys are a big blanket and ruthlessness - - the video portrays pretty accurately how pleased the typical newborn is to be swaddled. Here's some more tips on swaddling a baby.
Here's one that shows other calming techniques commonly used along with swaddling:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkR_e1L6zxI
Besides, women can't do this effectively (too much chest insulation). If it works, I look like a wizard. If it does not, the women call me an idiot and show me what I am doing wrong. I win either way.
I never tried growling.
There is NO real science that show any positive lasting benefit to the infant (in fact more studies are showing just the opposite - that swaddling does indeed screw up the infants mental well being).
If you think putting your kid in a straight jacket is "comforting" maybe you should give it a try for a few hours. Of course once you wear yourself out struggling, you'll sleep longer too.
//yes, I have two kids, never swaddled (after the first few days in the hospital), both have excellent mental heath and social skills.
Your own kids are not even remotely a significant enough of a sampling pool. Anecdotal remarks are even less reliable than an insignificantly small and selective sampling pool.
You can start by checking out the related videos on youtube. An especially good one #4 linked. Other methods of calming all tend to revolve around the same four tactics: Close holding, movement restriction, rocking motions and white noise. There isn't much difference between a swaddle wrap and a mother holding the baby close to her chest... except that that pesky other arm could easily fly up and they'd end up smacking themselves in the head.
Really, VonSkippy, your comments remind me too much of the kind of remarks that I hear from parents who say "Spanking is abuse" when their kids end up being the ones who deserve spankings the most.
You claim that the parents who say “Spanking is abuse” have that kids that end up being the ones who deserve spankings the most. Do you have any records on hand to back this up or is it just anecdotal?
Really!
How's this?
http://faculty.biola.edu/paulp/spare_the_rod.htm
Argument #10: Spanking leads a parent to use harmful forms of corporal punishment which lead to physical child abuse.
Counterpoint: The abuse potential when loving parents use appropriate disciplinary spanking is very low. Since parents have a natural affection for their children, they are more prone to underutilize spanking than to overutilize it. Both empirical data and professional opinion oppose the concept of a causal relationship between spanking and child abuse.
Surveys indicate that 70 to 90 percent of parents of preschoolers use spanking,[22] yet the incidence of physical child abuse in America is only about 5 percent. Statistically, the two practices are far apart. Furthermore, over the past decade reports of child abuse have steadily risen while approval for parental spanking has steadily declined.[23]
More than 70 percent of primary care pediatricians reject the idea that spanking sets the stage for parents to engage in forms of physical abuse.[24]
And now on to swaddling. In Medieval and Renaissance England, so I've learned, babies were often swaddled and kept wrapped up all week long! Each Sunday the wrap would be changed. This of course resulted in horrible diaper rash that probably left lasting scars. I imagine that the occasional bare-butt one sees in period movies probably looks much smoother than the real thing (Same goes for those straight teeth).
As the boys grew, we found success in putting their toys and other fun activities in time out. For instance, if someone misbehaved, their toy(s) would be put in time out for a certain amount of time or until their were ransomed by the child's good behavior.
In other words, "If you fight over the nintendo, it goes in time out for the rest of the day." This works because its not the child himself, but his beloved item that is in time out. Best if all, the item doesn't cry in the corner, begging to get out of time out.
As for blanket swaddling, I did it, and my kids were comforted by it. However, I didn't do it as often with my young son, as he was often "swaddled" and nursing in the baby sling, allowing me to have free hands with his brother.
Both boys are nice young men, well-balanced and a joy to us and others around them.
Nicholas, that's creepy about Medieval times and swaddling. Gosh, wouldn't those babies have cried all the time if their butts were raw? And they didn't bathe a whole lot either from what I recall. Soaking in water is the best thing for diaper rashes I've found.
As for the baby in the video, it's obviously older than three months and used to being unconfined. Of course it wouldn't be happy with the whole proceedings. Also, the blanket used was far too small for a good wrap, and the technique was sketchy.
I'd recommend for any new parents to try swaddling - if you have a fussy baby, it can be a life-saver! Just use common sense, pay attention to your child, and remember that every child is unique! Happy parenting!