Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio, dubbed "America's toughest sheriff," has a plan to cut down on drunk drivers: force 'em to work in a chain gang and make 'em wear pink underwear!
"Maybe this will warn people - knock it off, don't drink and drive," Mr Arpaio said. "You'll end up in pink underwear on the chain gang."
Do you think Sheriff Joe is right? Or is it just cruel and unusual punishment?
Second offense? 5 year jail term, lifetime ban on driving.
Third? Do you really think there'd be a third?
http://www.reason.com/news/show/122456.html
No a/c in Phoenix during the summer? Chain gangs? Hurting the prisoners self esteem with pink underwear, bedtime stories, and bologna meals? Boo hoo.
Aside from the underwear, that treatment is not too different from soldiers humping crosscountry in Vietnam or Iraq.
A lot of these weenies attacking Joe need a priority check.
1. He's a badass law enforcement officer with a long re-election record because he talks tough and enforces the law in tough measurements; Tent City is his brainchild, where short-medium sentence inmates sweat it out in tents outside the jail, are fed bologna sandwiches and water, and yes the pink underwear.
2. He's a politician who waves his prick at the people of Maricopa County in an attempt to look like a badass, and if it backfires on him, he just goes quiet for awhile until his next big prick-wave comes around.
And sometimes, he's just an idiot with a SWAT team at his disposal. http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2004-08-05/news/dog-day-afternoon/1
Last thing my crossing guard did not die but I never did she her again. She was a friend to me.
So kudos to the sheriff for making a stand. I don't know how good the prisons in America are, but any way of making time spent in prison more of a punishment is a good idea in my books.
Maybe pink underwear is punishment for he-man types, but it can't be that effective.
Chronic drunk drivers will continue to break the law no matter what colour underwear you make them wear.
the man has understanding of the US constitution, just his mostly useless and frequently illegal punishments.
what happened to the idea that prison was for rehabilitation?
Oh, because encouraging prison rape is a greeeaat idea. Yeesh. Cruel and unusual punishment anyone?
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2007-10-18/news/breathtaking-abuse-of-the-constitution/
Forunately, someone saw Arpaio's stunt for the complete BS it is.
http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/runninscared/archives/2007/10/the_charges_are.php
@Thomas: i agree. if bars had breathalizers or offered a free breathalizer keychain with the third shot, people might take a little more responsibility. my friend got a DWI and wasn't even intoxicated. she had one beer and they didn't make her take the breathalizer. she's on probation and her license was suspended (not sure for how long, though). it's on her record. and she probably wears pink underwear willingly.
a local man is taking our penile system for granted by committing petty theft and turning himself in every time. he has been in and out of jail for years and i bet he doesn't plan on stopping these actions. i can think of no other reason he would do this than the homely environments provided by our prisons. i mean, free room and board, free meals, free clothes... i'm wondering how many criminals commit crimes just so they can go to jail. i'm sure that's why there are so many returning convicts too.
@kid_icarus: I think you mean "sadistic".