Lizzie Bravo: The Girl Who Sang with the Beatles

Neatorama presents a guest post from actor, comedian, and voiceover artist Eddie Deezen. Visit Eddie at his website or at Facebook.

"Across the Universe" is possibly the most shapeless, formless song the Beatles ever recorded. Written entirely by John Lennon, the lyrics are sung almost in the style of a writer writing in free form, it has a kind of stream-of-consciousness feel to it. As so often happens in the world of Beatle fans and followers, some are baffled by the lyrics, confused about what the composer is trying to say.

To me, it has always been the Beatles most libertarian song, John is simply proclaiming his firmest, most fundamental belief and tenet, as he repeats the words "Nothing's gonna change my world" over and over, almost like a mantra.

Interestingly and ironically, John wrote the song a few months before he decided to cast his lot and assume his famous lifelong relationship with Japanese avant-garde artist Yoko Ono. (John and Yoko officially got together in may of 1968.) Although the song seems to be a direct message to the world about his life with Yoko, "Across the Universe" actually was written a few months earlier.

The song's genesis was in 1967, as John describes it: "I was lying next to my wife (John's first wife, Cynthia) in bed, you know, and I was irritated... she must have been going on and on about something and she'd gone to sleep... I kept hearing these words over and over, flowing like an endless stream. I went downstairs and it turned into a sort of a cosmic song rather than an irritated one."

(YouTube link)

John and his fellow Beatles were in the middle of their transcendental meditation period and had recently been living and studying with the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, at his camp, trying, like all of us, to find "the answer." John's eastern study definitely influenced the song, it's feel. He claimed, "The words were purely inspirational and were given to me as boom! I don't own it, you know. It came through like that."

Although never a greatly popular Beatles song, John was always very proud of it. "It's one of the best lyrics I've written," he stated. "In fact, it could be the best. It's good poetry."

"Across the Universe" was mainly recorded in early February of 1968, although it was dubbed and mixed on and off for almost the next two full years. Although originally planned as a Beatles A-side record, the song was not released until the Let It Be album in 1970. (John can be seen still working on "Across the Universe" in Let It Be, the Beatles final movie, filmed in January 1969.)

Recording of the song officially began on Sunday, February 4, 1968. That fateful day, a 16-year-old Brazilian girl named Lizzie Bravo was hanging around EMI studios at Abbey Road, along with many other girls, hoping to catch a glimpse of the Beatles. Lizzie had been in London since February 14, 1967. Her trip to England had been a gift from her parents for her fifteenth birthday.

According to Lizzie: "My best friend Denise had arrived in London a month before and we were supposed to be there just for the school holidays- but from day one I knew I would stay. The sole purpose of our trip was to see the Beatles." Before her money ran out, Lizzie found herself a job as an au pair.

On February 4, 1968, Lizzie Bravo was quite possibly the most surprised human being on earth. It seemed like another routine "waiting to see the Beatles" day, when all of a sudden Paul McCartney emerged and walked toward the group of thrilled young ladies. Paul asked the assembled female fans if any of them could hold a high note.

Lizzie, and another groupie named Gayleen Pease, quickly volunteered. As the other girls watched in disbelief, Lizzie and Gayleen were taken inside Abbey Road studios. The girls' fantasy of fantasies was about to come true- they were not only going to see and meet the Beatles, they were going to sing on a Beatles song!

Lizzie and Gayleen stepped up and shared microphones with Paul McCartney and John Lennon, singing the chorus of "Across the Universe" over and over ("Nothing's gonna change my world"). The session finally ended for the awestruck young ladies, they were thanked and left, probably thinking it had all been some kind of a surreal dream. One can only imagine what they told the shocked Beatle groupies as they came out of Abbey Road and re-joined them.

Ten days after her unforgettable singing session, Lizzie was standing outside Paul McCartney's house with two of her friends, hoping, as usual, to espy a Beatle. Suddenly, to Lizzie's happy surprise, John Lennon walked out and Lizzie asked him to sign a photo she had taken of him. John remembered his ex-fellow singer, took the photo and scribbled the words "To Liz, thanks for a great year. Love, John Lennon X" on it.

"It was just a nice remark," recalled Lizzie, "I was certainly not a friend of his or an intimate. I was just a little girl from Brazil who was a fan."

(Image source: Lizzie Bravo on Facebook)

Lizzie Bravo is now a mother and a grandmother. She lives in Rio and has sung, recorded, and toured with several Brazilian groups. She is publishing an illustrated book- From Rio to Abbey Road, based on her teenage diaries and photos she took during her time in London. The book (obviously) includes a full chronicle of Lizzie's unbelievable recording session with the Fab Four in February '68.

When Beatle fans all over gather together, they like to compare notes. "I saw Paul in Chicago," or "I shook John's hand in New York," or "I was at the Beatles concert in San Francisco," etc. etc. etc.

But Lizzie Bravo pretty much has bragging rights over all of us. After all, how many of us can say they actually sang on a Beatles song- with the Beatles?

(YouTube link)


Comments (5)

Newest 5
Newest 5 Comments

That's pretty interesting. I didn't know that there was someone actually holding and moving his hand. I don't see how that's actually him. It sure didn't look like HE was the one moving the hand where he wanted. More like she was moving his hand to where she wanted.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
this is a sad case of well-meaning care-givers operating under the ideomotor effect. randi is totally correct in both his skepticism and his conclusions.

however, there are folks who have been "locked-in" and there was one (disturbing) research investigation into awareness levels of vegetative patients that showed brain activity consistent with awareness -- here's the pubmed entry:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16959998

"We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to demonstrate preserved conscious awareness in a patient fulfilling the criteria for a diagnosis of vegetative state. When asked to imagine playing tennis or moving around her home, the patient activated predicted cortical areas in a manner indistinguishable from that of healthy volunteers."

note that the researcher's findings have not been verified or replicated, but the study and research is probably still very solid science.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Here's a video link to "Prisoners of Silence" that Randi referenced. I agree with Randi, this is a farce.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3439467496200920717#
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Oh. Yeah, facilitated communication is always bunk. It never seems to be able to work if the "facilitator" can't see the keyboard, for some reason....
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Not communicating. Watching the how quickly the "facilitator" uses the poor fellow's splinted finger to tap the keyboard, I'm convinced it's her doing the communicating, not him.

What's really sad is that the experts and the so-called doctor journalist just take this at face value. And I have to consider that this story is being promoted cynically right now just to inflame anti health care reform sentiment.

Just how long has this particular "facilitation" gone on? Who initiated it and why? How long did it take for the "facilitator" to produce communication and what's the supposed process (feeling micro muscle twitches or is there a psychic claim?) and who does the "facilitator" work for?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
A number of studies on "facilitated communication" back when it was in vogue for autistic children showed that the children frequently did not need to be able to see the screen or the keyboard, whereas the facilitator appeared to (try typing with one finger without looking at the keyboard--it's quite impossible, even if you can touch-type).

Further experiments (e.g. in which the child was shown an image not shown to the facilitator and asked to describe it) showed the communication to be entirely that of the facilitator.

These experiments are easily implemented and would quickly set the record straight for this subject, as well, were the patient's family (and doctors?) not wedded to the false hope provided by what is almost certainly a farce.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
There's a Wikipedia entry for Rom Houben. The story is old (2006) but Houben's doctor Steven Laureys has just published a paper regarding misdiagnosis of coma: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/9/35

The paper doesn't mention facilitation. Nor does it mention communication, except as one measure in assessing vegetative state.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Um...I can't get to the the actual link on the randi.org site as it seems to be locked up but....James Randi is dead, how could he be commenting on this case? Granted, this essay may be old and does indeed comment on this type of thing, but you should e clear in your post that James Randi is not commenting on this man in particular.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Yyyyeah... James Randi is very much alive. Every skeptical blog on the internet would light up immediately if Randi died. He's undergoing treatment for cancer, I believe, but just last month he made a live appearance by teleconference and did an interview with Skeptic's Guide to the Universe. By his account, treatment is going well and he's working on a new book.

If Randi is dead, then there's been a cover-up of epic proportions :)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Novanglus is correct, Randi is dead. He is communicating via a full-body facilitator. There is some doubt that the opinions Randi is expressing are indeed his own or merely the opinions of the facilitator.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
My mother was in a coma and I could tell by her eyes that she was getting what I was talking about. If you know your love one you will be able to tell even the slightest eye movements or facial ticks. This fellows mother says he was conscious, I believe her! Been there myself. ps the nurses and doc, also did not get the on target facial expressions, but I know how her face moves and her opinions, so there was no doubt she was aware.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I agree that this looks a bit sketchy, but I would be hesitant to call all facilitation fraudulent. I think some facilitators are actually the ones communicating, wether they mean to or not, but I don't think this is always the case.

I've seen facilitators facilitate while only touching an elbow or shoulder. Where are you all getting your information that facilitation "doesnt work" if the facilitator isn't looking at the keyboard.

(facilitation while only touching the elbow)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyjl4p2mNK4
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'm not hesitant to call it fraudulent. This was shown to be bogus years ago. Check out the link to James Randi's site, Michelle.

How would they get the information to transmit while only touching a person's elbow or shoulder? How could a paralyzed person transmit any instructions through that elbow or shoulder as specific as "press A on the keyboard"?

Why doesn't Stephen Hawkings use s facilitator? Because he would disprove what they're doing. Strange how the only people that this supposedly wosks with are people who can not confirm the facilitator's accuracy.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"Lizzie Bravo: The Girl Who Sang with the Beatles"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More