Cancer Found in Mummy

An Egyptian mummy known as M1 is being studied at the National Archaeology Museum of Lisbon in Portugal. The 2,250-year-old male is thought to have have been between 51 and 60 years old when he died a slow, painful death from cancer.
Several post-mortem fractures, possibly produced by mishandling when the mummy was transported to Europe, afflicted the body.

But that wasn't all they found. A pattern of round and dense tumors, measuring between 0.03 and 0.59 inches, interspersed M1's pelvis and lumbar spine.

"The bone lesions were considered very suggestive of metastatic prostate cancer," wrote the researchers.

Indeed, prostatic carcinoma typically spreads to the pelvic region, the lumbar spine, the upper arm and leg bones, the ribs, ultimately reaching most of the skeleton.

Prates and colleagues considered other diseases as alternatives. But M1's sex, age, the distribution pattern of the lesions, their shape and density, strongly argued for prostate cancer.

Only one older case of prostate cancer has ever been found, in a 2,700-year-old skeleton from Siberia. Read more at Discovery News. Link -via Breakfast Links

Comments (6)

Newest 5
Newest 5 Comments

@ lulu
Before nuke power plants, high-voltage power lines,
cell phones, red dye #9, high-fructose corn syrup,
any processed food,etc. That's why it's interesting.
@ Mitch
That last line took a second, but funny.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
There are many Lisbons, there is one even in Spain (dont know why, have you any explanation for Lisbon in the english language?). Anyway, thanks, Miss Celania, for the quick correction.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Yeah, I reckon cancer has been around since cells have been multiplyin'.

I'm pretty sure there are a lot of Lisbon in San Francisco and other liberal communities, too.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Two out of three ain't good either. One of the earliest trials of Zener cards to test for ESP showed a statistically significant result, with one subject scoring almost 100%. By chance anything is possible. If the probability of something is 1:100 then we should expect to see it one out of a hundred times. But instead we assume we should never see it. Never-the-less it is possible for someone to guess correctly on the Zener cards over several trials, enough to give the impression of genuine ESP.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Playing poker can help resolve those kinds of errors in judgement. You find yourself saying "what are the chances?" quite frequently. Thus, professional poker players assert that the only true method of winning is over time. If your chance of winning is greater than 50% you only have to have enough money to keep playing until it pays off. So, if you are going to play poker you play tables that have a buy-in value 1/10th or less than your total bankroll, and you play hands that have a 50% or greater chance to win. That way you shouldn't go broke before you start to see some winnings and over-all you should win more than you lose. But this is assuming you are capable of keeping your ego in check. You simply cannot expect to win because your hand has a 99% probability to win, you'll lose everything playing that way.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Miss Cellania

I was referring to 2/3 being an indication of some kind of empirical fact of the cat's intellectual or visual acuity. I'm skeptical the cat even has object permamence, let alone the ability to track the hidden object over multiple transitions.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Not that I'm claiming this is much more than luck, but if you watch closely the 2nd shuffle (the one where the cat loses), the shell the cat "chose" is actually the one that originally had the pebbleorwhateveritwas underneath it. At 0:14 the shuffler slyly moves it under another shell, right before starting the shuffle. Easily missed, even by the most sharp-eyed of cats.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I will remind you of the rule we have around here: no personal attacks on other commenters. I have removed a couple of comments. Let's keep this discussion on the subject and no more name calling.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I was referring to 2/3 being an indication of some kind of empirical fact of the cat's intellectual or visual acuity. I'm skeptical the cat even has object permamence, let alone the ability to track the hidden object over multiple transitions.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@Jesss

Thanks for the link. I thought about it some more last night too. I have two cats and figured they probably have object permanence based on my experiences with them.

@Miss Cellania

Sorry for being overly critical. My mind is in the books and found I was extraordinarily critical yesterday, though I'm finding I'm fairly critical most of the time. In Philosophy criticism and argument take a different non-hostile form, and I forget that doesn't apply colloquially. The video is cute, but I guess I'm much more interested in the cognition of the cat.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"Cancer Found in Mummy"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More