Science, we are informed by conscientious historians of the discipline, is something that comes to us without anything we might call a “moral imperative” as to what we should or should not be doing with the knowledge. In fact, science has often been described as an “amoral” enterprise, which can be put to evil uses just as easily as good ones. Scientists themselves bear no responsibility to ensure how their discoveries are used by others.
But what if the scientist himself is a diabolical mad man?
Link - via thrivecore
From the Upcoming ueue, submitted by greeneagle.
"The most famous of those were his experiments with the severed heads of dogs. One of which was able to eat a piece of cheese for the audience"
Y'know that part in Animal House where they all cover up swearing with a cough ?
Well, I'm doing that now...
C'mon. How the hell could he do that ?!?
Not one of them is a mad engineer :(
Sigmund Rascher was Executed by Himmler for pretending to Extend their Fertility into their 50's by buying kidnapped babies.
But yet Himmler had no problem with the Sigmund's killing people in their portable Pressure Chamber.