Evolution requires more faith to believe than creation. I just can't get how a species is around for millions of years then bam!, it evolves into something entirely different. When was the last time that happened and to what?
Evolution is evidence based, and requires no faith.
Creationism is faith based, and requires no evidence.
Is your faith in God so very weak that it is necessary for you to deny reality? Is your faith strong enough for you to forgo all the benefits that evolution has brought to medicine, science, and agriculture?
The evolution of flowers is another important piece of the tapestry of life, of where we came from and to where we may go.
Felix + GQ, What has evolution brought to us in terms of science on its own basis? THere is no evidence here for the evolution of plants, in fact plants pose quite the problem for uniformitarians. GQ I have to disagree. Since leading evolutionists cannot find sufficient intermediate fossils in the fossil record, the most commonly used argument is that punctuated equilibrium (sudden change) is the driving force of evolution. I think it is you that needs to do some reading. Evolutionists when confronted with a major issue and threat to their theory just stick their finger in the wind to see which way it blows and go with some other unprovable theory. Bozko makes a good point in why don't we see any intermediatary evolution taking place right now. I think i know why.
Wes Research the quotes, you will find that even Steven J. Gould and others admit to there not being enough intermediates in the fossil record that is why they have come up with the punctuated equilibrium theory. Also science is observable and repeatable by definition. So if we are talking about evolution from a scientific debate, show me where an animal has changed from one kind to another that has been observed and repeated. There is not even a single case.
Comments (0)
Creationism is faith based, and requires no evidence.
Is your faith in God so very weak that it is necessary for you to deny reality? Is your faith strong enough for you to forgo all the benefits that evolution has brought to medicine, science, and agriculture?
The evolution of flowers is another important piece of the tapestry of life, of where we came from and to where we may go.
What has evolution brought to us in terms of science on its own basis?
THere is no evidence here for the evolution of plants, in fact plants pose quite the problem for uniformitarians. GQ I have to disagree. Since leading evolutionists cannot find sufficient intermediate fossils in the fossil record, the most commonly used argument is that punctuated equilibrium (sudden change) is the driving force of evolution. I think it is you that needs to do some reading. Evolutionists when confronted with a major issue and threat to their theory just stick their finger in the wind to see which way it blows and go with some other unprovable theory. Bozko makes a good point in why don't we see any intermediatary evolution taking place right now. I think i know why.
I believe what you mean to say is that no matter how many intermediate fossils we find, it is never sufficient enough for the creationists.
Research the quotes, you will find that even Steven J. Gould and others admit to there not being enough intermediates in the fossil record that is why they have come up with the punctuated equilibrium theory. Also science is observable and repeatable by definition. So if we are talking about evolution from a scientific debate, show me where an animal has changed from one kind to another that has been observed and repeated. There is not even a single case.